COW ELECTION 2014

LIVE CAM HWY 97 @ WESTSIDE RD

CHBC TV News

Carr's Landing

Joe Rich Community

Trepanier

Kelowna Capital News
Issuu

Kelowna Daily Courier

Penticton Herald

Penticton Western

Summerland Review

Sumrlnd.myezrock

Vernon Morning Star
Issuu

Vernon Daily Courier

Castanet.net

Bennett Bridge Cam

Interior Highway Cams

Kelowna Airport

Regional District of Central Okanagan

RDCO's Facebook

Regional District of Okanagan Similkameen

District of Lake Country

District of Peachland

City of Penticton

District of Summerland

City of Vernon

District of West Kelowna

--------


Kelowna's Best Rock

RDCO Board Calender
RDCO Meeting Schedule

RDCO Board Reports

RDCO Board Agenda

RDCO Board Minutes

Gov Service Agenda

Gov Service Minutes

NWCA Minutes

SILGA - Board

UBCM

RDCO GIS Map

For sprinkling and watering days, click here.

-------

Westside Rd. Maps

C.O.W. Links

NW Ratepayers

Edgson News

NWCA

Westside Rd Interchange

Westside Road Updates

Westside Rd COMPLAINT FORM

Westside Residents Association

Jobs in Vernon

Jobs in Kelowna

Report Email Spam here.

Report Bad Links Here

Food Action Society

JOKES

WolframAlpha
Calculator/Answers

WikiLeaks.org

Datadotgc.ca

OpenDataBC

ProactiveDisclosure

BCGov FOI form

BC Forest Fire Info
Twitter
Facebook

BC Wildfires of Note
EmergencyInfoGovBC
Sound Cloud

Scan BC

Kelowna Yacht Club Wind Direction/Speed

MissingKids.ca

Follow okanaganlakebc.ca on Twitter

Follow OkanaganLakeBC on Twitter

okanagan lake directory, waterfront vacation rentals, local businesses, shopping, vernon, kelowna, westbank, westside, winfield, kaleden, oyama, peachland, penticton, summerland, naramata

Kelowna Resident Disputes Building Bylaw Violation

in the

Regional District (of Central Okanagan)

Notice of Bylaw Contravention and Stop Work Orders

LAST UPDATE January 25, 2015

Click on your refresh button in the top menu, to be sure you see any updates.

Blue Divider Line

Use this information at your own risk, as this is not legal advice in any way shape or form.
We recommend you talk to a lawyer if you need legal advice.

This is only one property owners letter they sent to the Regional District of Central Okanagan in regards to a letter RDCO sent them saying their building was in violation due to occupancy and that an occupancy permit had not been granted.

Blue Divider Line

RDCO Building Bylaw #835
20. PENALTIES
20.1 Any person who breaches any provision of this bylaw commits an
offence and is liable, upon prosecution, to the penalties provided under
the Offence Act.

Offence Act
General penalty
4 Unless otherwise specifically provided in an enactment, a person who is convicted of an offence
is liable to a fine of not more than $2,000 or to imprisonment for not more than 6 months, or to both.

Blue Divider Line

A round table for Mayors
Castanet.net - by Grant Scott - Story: 74400 - Apr 27, 2012

The four member municipalities of the Inter-Municipal Services Advisory Board - Kelowna, West Kelowna, Vernon and Penticton - are continuing their work on common municipal issues including transit governance, the Okanagan Basin Water Board and environmental permitting.

The board is made up of the four municipal mayors and chief administrative officers.

On Friday, April 20, Kelowna Mayor Walter Gray, Vernon Mayor Robert Sawatzky, West Kelowna Mayor Doug Findlater and Penticton Mayor Dan Ashton met to plan ahead for the rest of 2012.

“By continuing to work together, the four municipalities are able to address areas of mutual concern, which will be a benefit to all the citizens of the Okanagan Valley,” says Penticton Mayor Dan Ashton.

In the past, that has included agreement on a common Safe Premises bylaw to handle properties found to be cultivating illegal drugs, the launching a Bylaw Dispute Adjudication System and lobbying for continued support of the Combined Forces Special Enforcement Unit of the RCMP, dedicated to organized crime activity.

This time around, the group discussed partnership opportunities with BC Transit, which is considering implementing a three-person panel to work with municipalities on planning.

The Mayors agreed that larger centres would like to work in tandem with its provincial transit partner, making the panel available to assist smaller centres with planning.

The group also noted it is looking forward to the Okanagan Basin Water Board’s strategic planning session scheduled for early June, and would call on municipal peers at the coming Southern Interior Local Government Association (SILGA) convention in Revelstoke to offer the OBWB suggestions and recommendations for consideration during its planning process.

Penticton Mayor Dan Ashton also broached the topic of environmental permitting issues relating to the reconstruction of streamside infrastructure, such as dike systems.

The City of Penticton will take the lead on the matter, writing a letter to senior government to review the lengthy and often costly process required before municipalities are able to conduct needed repairs.

Mayors Gray, Sawatzky, Findlater and Ashton signed two joint letters at the meeting: one to Premier Christy Clark seeking funding support for private landowners for forest fire mitigation and the other to the Union of BC Municipalities seeking a change in how funds are allocated under the Gas Tax Agreement.

Ongoing concerns that impact all member municipalities were also discussed, including enforcement of lakeshore zoning regulations and the RCMP policing agreement.

Inter-Municipal Services Advisory Board meetings are held quarterly and alternate between municipalities. The four mayors represent more than 80 per cent of the Okanagan’s population.

Blue Divider Line

Changes to fire code welcomed by B.C. chiefs
Keremeos Review - March 30, 2010

BC’s Fire Chiefs’ applaud the government for changes to the B.C. fire code announced in mid March. A change that will require every private home and hotel or motel room built before 1979 to have smoke alarms installed by May 1, 2010. “This is an issue that the Fire Chiefs’ Association of BC began lobbying for last year”, says FCABC President Stephen Gamble, “we are very happy to see that the government acted upon it so quickly in the interest of public safety.”

Previously buildings built after 1979 were required to have smoke alarms. This new law will also increase public awareness, helping to reduce the health risks and property damage caused by fire in older buildings.

The Fire Chiefs’ Association of British Columbia represents almost 350 fire chiefs and regional fire managers throughout the province.

Blue Divider Line

.pdf icon April 8, 2010 Regional District of Central Okanagan Governance and Services Committee Meeting Minutes

6. Development Services

6.1 Bylaw Dispute Adjudication Program (follow-up report)

Staff report dated March 30, 2010 outlined the background information on the bylaw adjudication program. Since late 2009 staff have further participated in meetings by the Okanagan Valley Adjudication Group and took the opportunity to explain why participation of the Regional District is not appropriate in that the program is intended for minor issues such as parking violations. The Regional District does not have a traffic bylaw and tickets are primarily issues under the dog
control function. Due to the complexities in dog control service, these tickets are not suitable for the adjudication program.

Staff highlighted the dog control policies with regards to ticketing. The public has the option to dispute a ticket, and if they do, the court system is the only option.

Staff are reviewing the compliance issues and actions.

#GS32/10 OPHUS/EDGSON
THAT the Regional District of Central Okanagan not participate in the Okanagan Valley Bylaw Dispute Adjudication Program;

AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to investigate the Okanagan Valley Program for actual costs and results in the year after its implementation.

CARRIED

Blue Divider Line

.pdf icon April 8, 2010 Highlights of the Regional District of Central Okanagan Regional Board Meeting

Nothing mentioned about Item 2.4 Bylaw Dispute Adjudication Program in the Highlights of the Board Meeting

April 8, 2010 Regional District of Central Okanagan Regional Board Meeting Agenda

.pdf icon Agenda - April 8, 2010.pdf

.pdf icon Item 2.4 Bylaw Dispute Adjudication Program.pdf

Agenda No: 2.4
Mtg Date: Apr 8, 2010
Regional Board Report

TO: Regional Board
DATE: April 8, 2010
SUBJECT: Bylaw Dispute Adjudication Program
Full report from the April 8, 2010 Governance & Services Committee Meeting

G&S Committee Meeting April 8, 2010 Item 6.1 Bylaw Dispute Adjudication Program.pdf

Recommendation
THAT the Regional Board not participate in the Okanagan Valley Bylaw Dispute Adjudication Program;

AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to investigate the Okanagan Valley Program for actual costs and results in the year after its implementation.

.pdf icon April 8 2010 Regional District of Central Okanagan Special Board Meeting Minutes (Pg. 2)

2.4 Bylaw Dispute Adjudication Program

SHEPHERD/OPHUS
THAT the Regional District of Central Okanagan not participate in the Okanagan Valley Bylaw Dispute Adjudication Program;

AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to investigate the Okanagan Valley Program for actual costs and results in the year after its implementation.

CARRIED

Blue Divider Line

Local Government Act

Cancellation of note against land title

58 (1) On receiving a report from a building inspector that the condition that gave rise to the filing of the notice under section 57 (3) has been rectified, the corporate officer must file a cancellation notice and, on receiving the notice, the registrar of land titles must cancel the note against the title to which it relates.

(2) An owner of land with respect to which a notice has been filed under section 57 (3), may apply to the council for a resolution that the note be cancelled.

(3) After hearing an applicant under subsection (2), the council may pass a resolution directing the corporate officer to file a cancellation notice.

(4) If a resolution has been passed under subsection (3), the corporate officer must file a cancellation notice in the land title office and, on receiving the notice, the registrar of land titles must cancel the note against the title to which it relates.

(5) If the council does not pass a resolution under subsection (3), the owner may apply to the Supreme Court and notify the municipality to attend before the court to show cause why the note should not be cancelled.

(6) On an application under subsection (5), after reviewing any evidence that the owner and the municipality may adduce, the court may make an order directing the registrar to cancel the note made under section 57 (5) and, on receiving the order, the registrar of land titles must cancel the note accordingly.

Blue Divider Line

This letter from RDCO Chief Building Inspector says the following:

It is possible for occupancy to be granted even though the building may not be one hundred per cent completed. In order to obtain occupancy the building must be safe to occupy and capable of functioning as a single family dwelling as described in the BC Building Code.

It is possible for occupancy to be granted even though the building may not be one hundred per cent completed.
click letter to read larger print

 

Excerpt from Regional District of Central Okanagan Bylaw #835

-------------------------

1. DEFINITIONS

1.1 In this bylaw the following definitions shall apply:

f) "Completion Certificate" means an occupancy permit.

j) "Occupancy" means the use or intended use of a building or part thereof for the shelter or support of persons, animals or property.

k) "Occupancy Permit" shall mean an inspection form, corresponding with the occupancy inspection, which shows that the Inspector considered that no further inspections were necessary and that the project authorized by the permit was considered to be complete and ready for use at the time of the occupancy inspection.

n) "Permit" shall mean the document issued under the authority of this bylaw which authorizes an owner to proceed with the project as described on the permit form and related documents.

o) "Project" shall mean construction, erection, repair, alteration, enlargement, addition, installation, demolition, removal or change of class of occupancy.

-------------------------

7.9 No person shall change the occupancy of a building or part of a building without first obtaining a permit from the Inspector which authorizes the change.

-------------------------

7.10 No owner, agent or tenant shall allow use of a project or portion of a project for which a permit is required under this bylaw, without first obtaining an occupancy permit.

-------------------------

19.1.4
For all other projects and additions and alterations thereto the required inspections are:

f) Occupancy inspection - after the project or a portion thereof is complete and ready for use, prior to any occupation of the whole or any portion of the project.

-------------------------

19.10 When doing an occupancy inspection, the Inspector is authorized to review only the following items:

a) where Registered Professionals are involved with the project, their Schedule 'Cs;
b) Completeness of exterior finish including height above grade;
c) installation of required wall flashings and masonry supports;
d) driveway designed to keep runoff out of garage/carport;
e) down spout termination;
f) deadbolt latches, security screws, door viewers, NRP hinges;
g) interior and exterior handrails;
h) correct size and location of interior and exterior guardrails;
i) completeness of interior floor, wall and ceiling finishes;
j) smoke alarms in place and functioning;
k) doors and closers in place and functioning;
I) fire exit windows in place and accessible;
m) stops and traps on plumbing - materials and placement;
n) required waterproof wall finishes in place and functioning;
o) plumbing fixtures - approved materials and connected;
p) heating system in place and operational;
q) hot water supply system in place and operational;
r) mechanical ventilation of building interior;
s) contractor's certificate for loose fill and spray applied thermal insulation;
t) weatherstripping;
u) required egresses, as per plan;
v) required fire alarm systems - tested and verified;
w) required emergency lighting and exit signs in place and operating;
x) closures in fire separations - in place, type and rating;
y) exhaust systems for commercial kitchens, spray booths, etc., installed,
tested and signed off by a Registered Professional;
z) required fire sprinkler systems installed, tested and signed off by a Registered Professional;
aa) fire hydrant placement, as per plan;
bb) fire department accesses, as per plan;
cc) fire extinguisher placement, as per plan;
dd) ramp slopes;
ee) disabled requirements - lever handles, handrail terminations, highlighted risers, clear and level areas, tactile warning systems, directional signs, door lettering, paths of travel l automatic doorsl washroom requirements, areas of refuge, floor level changesl exit door colours l handrail colours.

----------------------------------------

20. PENALTIES
20.1 Any person who breaches any provision of this bylaw commits an offence and is liable, upon prosecution, to the penalties provided under the Offence Act.

Blue Divider Line

Local Government Act
Regional district building regulations

694 (3) An occupancy permit required under subsection (1) (d) may be withheld until the building or part of it complies with the following:

(a) the Provincial building regulations;

(b) bylaws under this section;

(c) any other health and safety requirements established by bylaw;

(d) any other federal or Provincial enactment in relation to health or safety
.

Blue Divider Line

Oct. 25, 2009

To RDCO Chief Building Inspector Ray Paterson:

Ray Paterson, thank you for your correspondence of Oct. 9, 2009 demanding another building inspection by Oct 30, 2009 or else. Or else what? What is it that you are threatening me with? I do not know how to respond to you when I don’t have a clue what you mean by this threat. I feel it only prudent and fair that you clarify what it is you are threatening me with?

May I remind RDCO that my building permit has not expired and that my last building inspection report signed and dated by you Ray Paterson Chief Building Inspector was on June 2, 2009, which according to bylaw #835 will not expire unless there has been no progress for over one year. In my case the pink inspection report of June 2, 2009 shows I need to do a couple of corrections on the progress that was made up until June 2, 2009 besides the SLOW, NO CHANGE interpretation of that same inspection written on the same inspection report by the same Chief Building Inspector.

As I read and understand the definition of occupancy permit in bylaw #835

f) "Completion Certificate" means an occupancy permit.

k) "Occupancy Permit" shall mean an inspection form, corresponding with the occupancy inspection, which shows that the Inspector considered that no further inspections were necessary and that the project authorized by the permit was considered to be complete and ready for use at the time of the occupancy inspection.

I feel bylaw #835 definition of “occupancy permit” means the whole building project is required to be finished and complete before an occupancy permit is granted because it is one permit, despite bylaw #835 definition

j) "Occupancy" means that use or intended use of a building or part thereof for the shelter or support of persons, animals or property.

Both the above occupancy definitions seem to contradict each other. One says “complete and ready for use” and the other says “part thereof”. What does project authorized by the permit mean? Does “the project” not mean the entire “building permit”? To me the project authorized by the permit being complete means the entire permit is finished and complete and no more inspections are required. Does complete mean the whole project authorized by the permit is unfinished and incomplete to RDCO? Am I wrong in my assumption? If I am wrong, please correct me.

In my case it would not matter the state of my building, occupancy permit or not, because I need a place to live that is warm, safe and secure this winter no matter what RDCO thinks. My building is only partly finished as you well know, or at least should know according to the building inspection reports thus far. I question your need to re-inspect the building so soon since the last inspection of June 2, 2009. Did you not read or understand the last registered letter I sent to you? What is it that you do not understand in regards to the Canadian Charter or UN Declaration?

I have not been keeping anything hidden from the Regional District, unlike the Ray Paterson directing unknown threats at me as stated in your last letter dated Oct. 9, 2009. I feel that the last letter I received from you is more like a mind game card and that this mind game is not very professional and further that this mind game can not be taken seriously as it is not a directive of the Regional Board members but is instead an unspecified threat that the Chief Building Inspector must have conjured up on his own. I don’t see in the bylaws where it says the Chief Building Inspector has the authority to carry out a threat on his own accord. If I am wrong, can you please point out where it says you have authority to carry out such action?

Like I said in my last letter, I cannot permit the Regional District to enter upon my property further, and that any further building inspections required will be performed by hired professionals who I am sure will not write SLOW, NO CHANGE on my building inspection report but will instead write a professional report and who will not threaten me with unknown recourse, nor will request unreasonable searches.  May I also remind you that bylaw #835 section 8.13 states quote,
No person shall rely upon any permit as establishing compliance with this bylaw or assume or conclude that the bylaw has been administered or enforced according to its terms. The person to whom the building permit is issued and his or her agents are responsible for making such determinations.


I feel section 8.13 of bylaw #835 means that it is my own plus my agent’s responsibility to make sure that the building is in compliance with bylaw #835 and not RDCO’s responsibility. Please correct me if I am wrong. I feel that bylaw #835 is not in compliance with the Canadian Charter of Human Rights and Freedom nor the UN Declaration of Human Rights and therefore I feel I need to take responsibility against the portions of bylaw #835 not in compliance. I take it that you disagree since you are insisting on another inspection by Oct 30, 2009. I disagreed with you, as I pointed out in my last letter to you, so I don’t understand why you are demanding an immediate inspection. Why are you not recommending to the Board Member’s whom make the decisions to take me to court if you disagree?

In my last letter to you, I stated that I will allow a building permit inspection report when I am ready for the next building permit inspection and before my building permit will expire on June 2, 2010 despite Bylaw #835 section 7.9 which states, No person shall change the occupancy of a building or part of a building without first obtaining a permit from the Inspector which authorizes the change. Please re-read the last letter I sent you plus the Canadian Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms and the UN Declaration of Human Rights in regards to this.

As I understand it, an occupancy permit means COMPLETE with floor finish (linoleum) and wall finish (paint) according to RDCO bylaw #835 section 19.10

When doing an occupancy inspection, the Inspector is authorized to review only the following items:
i) completeness of interior floor, wall and ceiling finishes;

As I understand section 19.10 of bylaw #835, I will not be granted an occupancy permit without the drywall mudded and taped and painted and without the floor finish (linoleum) applied to the entire building, which I feel means RDCO will not allow occupancy of the building if these are not complete, which you are well aware they are not complete. If you feel I am wrong about my assumption that the whole building needs to be complete please correct and advise me what all needs to be complete in order to be eligible to be granted an occupancy permit. Do I not need an inspection to show the exterior is complete? Maybe I can comply with an occupancy permit willingly, if I have the means to comply and I completely understand what exactly it is you require that I comply with in order to be granted an occupancy permit. Please explain in detail if you require the mud and taping of the drywall right down to the paint plus what type of floor finish bylaw #835 is referring to (lino etc.), plus what is required to be complete in each room of my building in order for you to grant an occupancy permit. Maybe I misunderstood what occupancy permit means to RDCO? Also, what is it that you feel is unsafe about the building as one of your initial letters stated? Please do not ignore my questioning and reply with answers to my questions this time instead of ignoring me again please?

I feel section 7.9 of RDCO bylaw #835 goes against the Canadian Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms and therefore I refuse to permit the Regional District of Central Okanagan to force me to sleep in a tent this winter no matter what stage my building permit may be at. I can only afford to live in the building as I stated in my last letter. It was minus 9 degrees for two nights in a row a couple weeks ago and I surely would not have survived that temperature sleeping in a tent with my poor blood circulation. My building permit has a lock on both doors for my security, there is inspected and proper fire escape egress through the bedroom window and all the safety factors are in place and working, including locks on the windows, approved and inspected smoke alarms, R20 insulation in the walls and R40 in the ceiling, vapor barrier fully tuck taped, tar paper exterior, plus there is a pellet stove (inspected by a previous RDCO inspector) to help keep me warm. I have a roof over my head and am safe and secure in my building, unlike my other option (a tent) could ever provide me. I don’t understand why another inspection is required as you already know exactly what stage my building is at according to the last report. My building has been built according to code as reported in each of RDCO’s written inspection reports.

If what I proposed in my last letter is unacceptable to RDCO then please permit a judge to decide our disagreement. As I understand the law, a disagreement in regards to the Canadian Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms and/or the UN Declaration of Human Rights needs to be taken to court and that is what I wish to happen if we cannot come to an agreement.

You may place a notice on the title of my property if that is your future preferred unknown recourse, but may I warn you that this will do nothing for you, as I do not plan on ever selling and I have every intention of standing up for MY rights to have an affordable safe, secure, and warm place to sleep anywhere in Canada. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms tells me I have the right to live anywhere in Canada. I was born in British Columbia Canada. I need a safe secure place to sleep no matter if occupancy is granted or not.

I feel that the Canadian Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms plus the UN Declaration of Human Rights would preclude RDCO’s barbaric bylaw #835 as well as Federal and Provincial Government building code and statutes in regards to occupancy permits. In any case a judge would correct either of us if we were wrong. It looks to me like we have a steadfast disagreement in reading your last letter dated Oct 9, 2009 insisting I have an inspection by Oct 30, 2009 when I just had an inspection in June 2009. Maybe this disagreement should go to court if we are so steadfast in our thoughts? I feel you are unreasonably searching my building asking for an inspection so soon and that I need a place to live no matter the state of progress on the building.

May I remind you that my lawyer has advised me to live in my building and that I was advised by my lawyer that it would be best to have a judge decide our disagreement if absolutely necessary.

You may want to review the case of Adams vs. the City of Victoria in regards to a tent city erected in the city park, plus re-read the UN Declaration of Human Rights and the Canadian Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms to help decide what unknown action you have just threatened me with, since you did not elaborate what it is you are threatening me with (quote, further recourse).

Let me further remind you that it is all Regional District’s, plus Federal and Provincial Government’s mandates to combat homelessness instead of creating homelessness! People building their own homes should be permitted to live in them while they build, but I don’t see that to be the case, instead I see Government building homes for people to rent with government subsidy. The Government has completely ignored people whom want to try and survive on their own with what they have and live in their own home on their own property. This is only one reason why homelessness will NEVER cease. Government does not seem to understand that some people would rather live on the street than live in a shelter with rules. How many shelters can the government (taxpayers) afford to build anyway? I know I can’t afford to help invest in the banks to make record profits off me. The Regional District cannot require me to take out a mortgage so I can have a roof over my head if I can’t afford it.

And further to this letter, what harm has ever become of an occupier of a building without an occupancy permit in the past. Regional Districts have known full well someone has been occupying space without occupancy permits for years, as in the case of my parent’s property that has had a home built on it for close to 25 years with occupants living in it and obviously occupying the space the entire time paying full taxes without an occupancy permit.

Your co-operation in keeping me safe, warm and secure over future winters would be much more appreciated rather than a costly court battle that could cost taxpayers dearly including myself if I were to win my case, which this would not be fair to me as a taxpayer for RDCO to loose this court case against me, forcing me to pay as a taxpayer if I win my case, now would it?

Further to the above, I do not understand how it came about that the Chief Building Inspector Ray Paterson retains authority or has received permission from Regional Board members to threaten me with anything (letter dated Oct 9, 2009 quote, “pursuing another recourse”), as I read nothing in the bylaws nor the Regional Board or Governance and Services Committee agenda or minutes of the meetings in regards to this matter. Please advise me as to what Ray Patterson the Chief Building Inspector will be recommending to the Regional Board, as the October 9, 2009 letter does not explain anything of the sort.

I can only hope that Ray Paterson revises his stance, and that we can work out an agreement instead of having to take this to court. I look forward to your reply.

Thank you,
Kelowna Property Owner

CC: Development and Environmental Services Manager Dan Plamondon

There were a few letters back and forth and the last one was sent November 12, 2009.  It is Dec. 30, 2009 now and we haven't heard anything back yet.

Update March 7, 2010: RDCO is having a board meeting about this building violation dispute even though they haven't answered any of the questions asked of them in the several letters sent to them.  How can the property owner comply when RDCO refuses to answer the questions?

We will keep you informed.

Blue Divider Line

For more information on what may help you win a Regional District of Central Okanagan bylaw violation  click here

Info about Occupancy Permits

Westside Road BC Building Violations

More info about building violations

Blue Divider Line

To be updated by email on the latest news regarding this subject and other subjects, please send your email address to

We will let you know when there are updates, so stay informed!

Blue Divider Line

If you have comments good or bad, solutions, concerns or complaints regarding these bylaws, please fill out the form below, or contact RDCO Board of Directors

Blue Divider Line

Comment Form

NAME  
ADDRESS  
COMMUNITY     *(required)
(If your community is not listed above, please type it in below and choose "other community" above)
 
PHONE NUMBER  
EMAIL ADDRESS  
 disguise your email address from spam similar to this below
 name "at" hotmail.com
COMMENTS  

 

 

If you have a solution, you can email it to

Blue Divider Line

If you want to view the comments, click here.

Blue Divider Line

About RDCO Building Violations
Make a Comment

Building Inspections ] Build Laws - BC ] Build Laws - RDCO ] Building Violations ] Easement Roads ] Fintry Development ] Harassement ] History ] Homelessness ] Minutes ] NW OCP ] RDCO Policy ] RDCO Regs ] [ Violation Dispute ] WR Development ]

Blue Divider Line

About RDCO Building Violations
Read Comments

Building Inspection ] Build Laws - BC ] Build Laws - RDCO ] Building Violations ] Easement Road ] Fintry Development ] Harassment ] History ] Homelessness ] Minutes ] NW OCP ] RDCO Policy ] RDCO Regs ] Violation Dispute ] WR Development ]

Blue Divider Line

Letters from RDCO Chief Building Inspector

Entire Story ] Jan 27 2004 ] Jan 18 2005 ] Sep 22 2005 ] Dec 16 2005 ] Mar 14 2006 ] May 29 2007 ] Aug 7 2007 ] Jun 11 2008 ] Feb 10 2009 ] Jul 24 2009 ] Sept 1 2009 ] Oct 9 2009 ] Nov 6 2009 ] Jan 22 2010 ] Feb 5 2010 pg 1 ] Feb 5 2010 pg 2 ] Feb 11 2010 ] Mar 22 2010 Meeting ] RDCO Policy ]

Blue Divider Line

Letters to RDCO Chief Building Inspector

Aug 24 2009 ] Sept 10 2009 ] Sept 22 2009 ] Oct 25 2009 ] Nov 12 2009 ] Feb 3 2010 ] Questions ]

Blue Divider Line

Westside Road Gossip
Make a Comment

INDEX WR ] INDEX ALL ] Advis. Plan Comm ] Alt Approval ] Ambulance ] Argo Road Maint. ] BC Hydro ] Budget 2010 ] Budget 2011 ] Budget 2012 ] Budget 2013 ] Budget 2014 ] Budget 2015 ] Building Inspect ] Build Laws - BC ] Build Laws - RDCO ] Building Violations ] Bylaw Anon ] COW Elect. 08 ] COW Elect. 11 ] Director Edgson ] Dogs ] Easement Rds ] EDC ] Elect. Boundary ] Environ. Advisory ] ESS ] Finances ] Fintry Develop ] Fintry Park ] Fire Anon ] Fire Boat ] Fire Bylaws ] Fire Dept. ] Fire Dept FOI ] Fire Hydrants ] Fire Minutes ] Fires  House ] FOI Act ] Friends Fintry ] Garbage ] Garbage Area ] Garbage Bylaws ] Garbage Com 08 ] Garbage Contracts ] Garbage Finance ] Garbage FOI ] Garbage FOI ] Garbage LaCasa ] Garbage Locker ] Garbage Minutes ] Garbage NOWESI ] Garbage Ombudsman ] Garbage Prob ] Garbage Secret ] Garbage Solution ] Garbage Survey ] Garbage Traders ] Governance Wide ] Government ] Grants-in-aid ] Helicopters ] History ] Killiney Beach Park ] Killiney Hall ] LaCasa ] Motorized Rec. ] NWCA ] NWCA FOI ] NW OCP ] NW Parks ] OKIB ] OKIB Logging ] OKIB Road ] OKIB Tax ] Peacocks ] Police Tax ] Property Tax ] RDCO ] RDCO Dog Minutes ] RDCO Jokes ] RDCO Policy ] RDCO Regs ] Report Animals ] Residents Network ] Septic Systems ] Subdiv. History ] T. Mnt After Fire ] Terrace Mount. Fire ] Trench Burner ] Vote Boxes ] Water Budget 08 ] Water Budget 09 ] Water Budget 10 ] Water Bylaws ] Water Construct ] Water FOI ] Water Grants ] Water Judgement ] Water L Fintry ] Water Laws ] Water Meters ] Water Minutes ] Water Rates ] Water Right-of-Way ] Water Survey ] Water System ] Water Systems ] Water VOS ] Water VOS Pics ] Water Wells ] Water Well Data ] Westshore Playgrnd ] Westshore Sports ] Westside Rd. ] WR Development ] WR Incorporation ] WR Overpass ] WRIC ] Zoning Bylaw 66 ] Zoning Bylaw 81 ] Zoning Bylaw 871 ]

Blue Divider Line

Westside Road Gossip
Read Comments

Adv. Plan Comm. ] Alt. Approval ] Ambulance ] Argo Road ] BC Hydro ] Budget 2010 ] Budget 2011 ] Budget 2012 ] Budget 2013 ] Budget 2014 ] Budget 2015 ] Building Inspection ] Build Laws - BC ] Build Laws - RDCO ] Building Violations ] COW Elect 08 ] COW Elect. 11 ] Director Edgson ] Dogs ] Easement Roads ] EDC ] Elect. Boundary ] Environ. Advisory ] ESS ] Finance ] Fintry Develop ] Fintry Park ] Fire Boat ] Fire Bylaws ] Fire Dept. ] Fire Dept FOI ] Fire Hydrants ] Fire Minutes ] Fires House ] FOI Act ] Friends Fintry ] Garbage ] Garbage Area ] Garbage Bylaws ] Garb Comment 08 ] Garbage Contract ] Garbage Finance ] Garbage FOI ] Garbage FOI ] Garbage La Casa ] Garbage Locker ] Garbage Minutes ] Garbage NOWESI ] Garbage Ombudsman ] Garbage Questionaire ] Garbage Secret ] Garbage Solution ] Garbage Survey ] Garbage Traders ] Governance Wide ] Government ] Helicopters ] History ] Killiney Hall ] Killiney Park ] La Casa ] Motorized Rec. ] NW OCP ] NWCA ] NWCA FOI ] NW Parks ] OKIB ] OKIB Logging ] OKIB Road ] OKIB Tax ] Peacocks ] Police Tax ] Property Tax ] RDCO ] RDCO Dog Minutes ] RDCO Jokes ] RDCO Policy ] RDCO Regs ] Report Animals ] Septic Systems ] Subdiv. History ] T. Mtn After Fire ] Terrace Mnt. Fire ] Trench Burner ] Vote Box ] Water Budget 08 ] Water Budget 09 ] Water Budget 10 ] Water Bylaws ] Water Construct ] Water FOI ] Water Grants ] Water Judgements ] Water Laws ] Water Meters ] Water Minutes ] Water Rates ] Water Right-of-Way ] Water Survey ] Water System ] Water VOS ] Water VOS Pics ] Water Well Data ] Water Wells ] Westside Road ] WR Development ] WR Incorporation ] WR Overpass ] WRIC ] Zoning Bylaw 66 ] Zoning Bylaw 1981 ] Zoning Bylaw 871 ]

Blue Divider Line

Gossip
In Other Towns

INDEX ALL ] Boucherie Rd ] Kaleden ] Kelowna ] Naramata ] Oyama ] Peachland ] Penticton ] Summerland ] Vernon ] West Kelowna ] Westside Road ] Winfield ]

Blue Divider Line

Index

Boucherie Road ] Kaleden ] Kelowna ] Naramata ] Oyama ] Peachland ] Pentiction ] Summerland ] Vernon ] West Kelowna ] Westside Road ] Winfield ]

Blue Divider Line

You will find local North Westside Road BC businesses, services, free classifieds, local arts and crafts, vacation waterfront rentals, plus much more located near and around Okanagan Lake BC.  We will be adding to this site, so come back and check it often.

KEYWORDS: bylaw contravention notice, notice on title, occupancy permit, stop work order, regional district, central okanagan, municipal bylaw, building permit, how to, fight, win, dispute, building, bylaw

Disclaimer: Information posted on this website may not necessarily always be true, but is based on the best ability of the publisher to this website to decipher.  Please be warned by this disclaimer that the publishers at okanaganlakebc.ca have been known to make mistakes before.  Please let the publisher know if you do notice any mistakes by filling out the feedback form, and mistakes will be corrected immediately.

Blue Divider Line

2006-2015 okanaganlakebc.ca