COW ELECTION 2014

LIVE CAM HWY 97 @ WESTSIDE RD

CHBC TV News

Carr's Landing

Joe Rich Community

Trepanier

Kelowna Capital News
Issuu

Kelowna Daily Courier

Penticton Herald

Penticton Western

Summerland Review

Sumrlnd.myezrock

Vernon Morning Star
Issuu

Vernon Daily Courier

Castanet.net

Bennett Bridge Cam

Interior Highway Cams

Kelowna Airport

Regional District of Central Okanagan

RDCO's Facebook

Regional District of Okanagan Similkameen

District of Lake Country

District of Peachland

City of Penticton

District of Summerland

City of Vernon

District of West Kelowna

--------


Kelowna's Best Rock

RDCO Board Calender
RDCO Meeting Schedule

RDCO Board Reports

RDCO Board Agenda

RDCO Board Minutes

Gov Service Agenda

Gov Service Minutes

NWCA Minutes

SILGA - Board

UBCM

RDCO GIS Map

For sprinkling and watering days, click here.

-------

Westside Rd. Maps

C.O.W. Links

NW Ratepayers

Edgson News

NWCA

Westside Rd Interchange

Westside Road Updates

Westside Rd COMPLAINT FORM

Westside Residents Association

Jobs in Vernon

Jobs in Kelowna

Report Email Spam here.

Report Bad Links Here

Food Action Society

JOKES

WolframAlpha
Calculator/Answers

WikiLeaks.org

Datadotgc.ca

OpenDataBC

ProactiveDisclosure

BCGov FOI form

BC Forest Fire Info
Twitter
Facebook

BC Wildfires of Note
EmergencyInfoGovBC
Sound Cloud

Scan BC

Kelowna Yacht Club Wind Direction/Speed

MissingKids.ca

Follow okanaganlakebc.ca on Twitter

Follow OkanaganLakeBC on Twitter

okanagan lake directory, waterfront vacation rentals, local businesses, shopping, vernon, kelowna, westbank, westside, winfield, kaleden, oyama, peachland, penticton, summerland, naramata

BC Freedom of Information Act requests

How the BC Freedom of Information Act protects government

and

how the BC Freedom of Information Act costs money and time.

Last updated January 25, 2015

Click on your refresh button in the top menu, to be sure you see any updates.

Blue Divider Line

Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
[RSBC 1996] CHAPTER 165

RDCO's own Freedom of Information Bylaw # 611 - 1994

Blue Divider Line

How to make a Freedom of Information Request of the BC Provincial Government

http://www.gov.bc.ca/citz/iao/foi/process/

Blue Divider Line

Datadotgc.ca - Federal Data

OpenDataBC - citizen lead website of data

OpenInfo.gov.bc.ca - ask for information and find BC Government information - online form to request info from the BC Government

Blue Divider Line

OIPC request for "Fee Waiver" ruling F05-36 - granted

Blue Divider Line

DID YOU KNOW THAT YOU ONLY HAVE 2 MONTHS TO NOTIFY A REGIONAL DISTRICT BY LETTER, IF YOU ARE TAKING A REGIONAL DISTRICT TO COURT, AND THAT YOU HAVE TO EXPLAIN EVERY DETAIL?

AND DID YOU KNOW YOU ONLY HAVE 6 MONTHS TO START COURT ACTION?

THERE ARE SOME CASES WHERE MORE THAN 6 MONTHS CAN PASS IF YOU HAVE A GOOD EXCUSE

FOR EVERYONE ELSE YOU HAVE 2 YEARS TO TAKE THEM TO COURT!!!

MUNICIPALITY MEANS REGIONAL DISTRICT
Local Government Act
[RSBC 1996] CHAPTER 323
Part 24 — Regional Districts
Division 1 — Interpretation

Application of other provisions
774 In the application of the other provisions of this Act or the Community Charter to regional districts, references are to be read as follows:

Reference To be read as
municipality............................... regional district

council...................................... board
mayor....................................... chair
councillor.................................. director
municipal officer........................ regional district officer

(We believe that Municipality means Regional District)

===================================

Local Government Act
[RSBC 1996] CHAPTER 323
Part 24 — Regional Districts
Division 6 — General

Legal proceedings and enforcement
847 (1) The following apply to a regional district and its board:

Division 2 [Proceedings against Municipality] of Part 7;

================================

Local Government Act
Part 7 — Legal Proceedings
Division 2 — Proceedings against Municipality

Limitation period for actions against municipality
285 All actions against a municipality for the unlawful doing of anything that

(a) is purported to have been done by the municipality under the powers conferred by an Act, and

(b) might have been lawfully done by the municipality if acting in the manner established by law,

must be commenced within 6 months after the cause of action first arose, or within a further period designated by the council in a particular case, but not afterwards.



Immunity unless notice given to municipality after damage
286 (1) A municipality is in no case liable for damages unless notice in writing, setting out the time, place and manner in which the damage has been sustained, is delivered to the municipality within 2 months from the date on which the damage was sustained.

(2) In case of the death of a person injured, the failure to give notice required by this section is not a bar to the maintenance of the action.

(3) Failure to give the notice or its insufficiency is not a bar to the maintenance of an action if the court before whom it is tried, or, in case of appeal, the Court of Appeal, believes

(a) there was reasonable excuse, and

(b) the defendant has not been prejudiced in its defence by the failure or insufficiency.

IT SAYS THERE IS EXCEPTION TO THIS IF THERE WAS REASONABLE EXCUSE. YOU CAN FIND CASES IN THE BC COURT JUDGEMENT DATABASE

SMALL CLAIMS COURT AND PROVINCIAL COURT JUDGEMENTS DATABASE

SUPREME COURT JUDGMENTS DATABASE

Blue Divider Line

.pdf icon December 10, 2012 Highlights of the Regional District of Central Okanagan Regular Board Meeting

Freedom of Information Bylaw Amended

The Regional Board has adopted an amendment to the Freedom of Information Bylaw No. 611. A new schedule of maximum fees has been approved to reflect the revisions made earlier this year to the BC Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.

-------------------------------

.mp3 file icon - click here for help with audio December 10, 2012 audio of entire RDCO Board meeting - .mp3 (9.45 MB)

Click this Windows Media Audio icon for help with audio files December 10, 2012 audio of RDCO Board meeting only about Item 9.2 Freedom Of Information Bylaw  - .wma (372 KB)

.pdf icon December 10, 2012 Regional District of Central Okanagan Regular Board Meeting Minutes

RDCO Board minutes are not usually posted to RDCO's website until after being adopted at the following Board meeting, which the next Regular Board meeting will be held January 17, 2013.  If the minutes are not posted here yet, you can check to see if they are posted on RDCO's website.

-------------------------------

.mp3 file icon - click here for help with audio December 10, 2012 audio of entire RDCO Board meeting - .mp3 (9.45 MB)

Click this Windows Media Audio icon for help with audio files December 10, 2012 audio of RDCO Board meeting only about Item 9.2 Freedom Of Information Bylaw  - .wma (372 KB)

Blue Divider Line

BC government withholds FOI responses from open info website
TheTyee.ca - By Andrew MacLeod November 7, 2011

A Vancouver researcher said he was surprised to learn recently that the British Columbia government is withholding its responses to certain freedom of information requests from its open information website.

"I was surprised mine would not be put up there," said Mark Weiler, a research associate at Simon Fraser University whose interests include public education regarding FOI.

Weiler had requested records showing how an earlier request he had made had been handled. The government provided Weiler with a 22-page response, but in the Oct. 26, 2011 cover letter noted, "The Ministry has determined that these records will not be published on the BC Government's Open Information website."

The ministry started publishing its responses to FOI requests on the website in July. Margaret MacDiarmid, the minister of Labour, Citizens' Services and Open Government, became responsible for the system after a September cabinet shuffle.

Asked last week which FOI responses the government might not be posting to the open information website, she said, "I think the rule is they all are after 72 hours or more."

After hearing a description of Weiler's request, she said, "My understanding is they are posted, so there must be something I'm not getting about this." She offered that Weiler could contact her directly to discuss the matter.

A spokesperson for the ministry said there's a July policy document publicly available, and the most likely explanation was that Weiler's request was considered to contain personal information.

"It does contain some personal information . . . but those could have been redacted easily," Weiler said. While the package contained a few emails with his name on them, that's quite different from a health record or another document that would normally be considered personal, he said.

A document released today, in response to another Weiler request, shows there are other categories of records that are not being posted.

In an Aug. 9, 2011 email, Chad Hoskins, the manager for open information planning, wrote to colleagues who handle FOI requests, "Please note that based on a further risk assessment, requests for calendars for any government employee or official will be considered exempt from publication on the Open Information website."

An earlier Hoskins email had said ministerial assistant calendars "will be considered exempt from publication due to personal safety concerns."

The threshold for withholding calendars due to security concerns should be high and not covered with a blanket policy, said Weiler. "On what basis would they have for withholding calendars for time in the past?"

Other records that get withheld include ones including 'proprietary' information on a First Nation, requests made by or for other governments where the response includes that government's confidential information, and responses that include confidential business information.

Weiler said he supports the government publishing responses on its open information website after a 72-hour embargo as it allows the public to see how public bodies handle FOI requests.

Andrew MacLeod is The Tyee’s Legislative Bureau Chief in Victoria. Reach him here.

Blue Divider Line

Waiting for land exchange documents
Castanet.net - by Wayne Moore - Story: 66907 - Nov 4, 2011

The land in question for the 'swap'

The District of West Kelowna has had a Freedom of Information Request put on hold -- yet again.

The municipality is trying to get information and documents relating to the controversial land exchange between the province and Westbank First Nation.

According to West Kelowna, that request has been delayed for a second time.

In a news release issued Friday, West Kelowna says it received word from the Ministry of Labour, Citizens' Services and Open Government November 1 stating its request for records pertaining to the land exchange would be delayed until March 12, 2012.

This is the second time an extension has been granted.

The original request through the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act was received by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure on July 22, 2011.

They were informed in mid September the government would not be able to respond to the request within the 30 business days as defined by the Act because of the large volume of records involved.

The deadline was extended to October 31.

That timeline has again been extended to march of next year, again because of the large volume and the requirement to consult with a public body and/or third party.

West Kelowna Council has raised a number of concerns regarding the government's commitment to turn over a 698 parcel of Crown land at the north and east side of the Rose Valley Reservoir in exchange for eight acres of reserve lands being used for highway projects between the bridge and Westside Road.

Blue Divider Line

*Note* This is only a snippet, please click link for entire contents

Regional District of Central Okanagan (Re), 2010 BCIPC 57 (CanLII)
Date: 2010-11-04
Docket: F10-14

Citation:
Regional District of Central Okanagan (Re), 2010 BCIPC 57 (CanLII)

Decision F10-14
REGIONAL DISTRICT OF CENTRAL OKANAGAN
Celia Francis, Senior Adjudicator
November 4, 2010
CanLII Cite: 2010 BCIPC 57

Summary: The RDCO requested under s. 56 that an inquiry not proceed in this case on the grounds that the information in dispute is the names and addresses of complainants about alleged bylaw infractions and thus clearly subject to s. 15(1)(d). It is plain and obvious that this exception applies and the respondent has not shown any basis on which an inquiry might have a different outcome. An inquiry will therefore not take place.

Document URL: http://www.oipc.bc.ca/decisions/230

------------------------------------------

2.0 DISCUSSION

The access request
[2] The respondent requested information from the RDCO “regarding the names and addresses of the persons that complained about the vehicles and trailers I have sitting on my land that I am dealing with your law enforcement officer”. The RDCO treated this as a request under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (“FIPPA”) and refused access to information on the complainants under s. 15(1)(d) and s. 22(3)(b) of FIPPA. The RDCO told the respondent that it has a policy of not releasing the personal information of complainants. It added this:

This is particularly pertinent in that all of the Regional District’s bylaw enforcement is based on responding to complaints. To make the complainant’s name available to the accused would likely put a dampening effect on the number of complaints received regarding bylaw infractions, thus severely hampering the Region’s ability to enforce their duly enacted bylaws. [underlining in original]

Source: Canlii.org

Blue Divider Line

District against land swap
Kelowna Capital News - Okanagan Similkameen - By Wade Paterson - August 04, 2011

The District of West Kelowna is objecting to a proposed land exchange between Westbank First Nation and the provincial government.

The proposed exchange would see WFN gain a 698-acre plot of Crown land in exchange for eight acres of reserve land, which are being used for the development of the Westside Road interchange.

Mayor Doug Findlater said the deal goes against the interests of taxpayers in the District of West Kelowna and the Regional District of Central Okanagan.

“Council is especially concerned because the provincial government refuses to provide the District of West Kelowna with a copy of the agreement it has signed with the Westbank First Nation, despite numerous requests for the document,” said Findlater.

Findlater also noted the province has yet to provide the district with any of the land appraisals regarding the land exchange. The portion of Crown land under consideration is near Rose Valley Reservoir and takes up a portion of Rose Valley Regional Park.

“Rose Valley Reservoir is the drinking water source for almost half of our community and having land use control around the reservoir transferred to another jurisdiction beyond our control is not acceptable,” said Findlater.

Westbank First Nation stated both they and the B.C. Ministry of Transportation have been working closely to come to a resolution that satisfies the contractual obligation of the provincial government regarding the land exchange.

“Westbank First Nation recognized and accommodated the needs of the greater community when providing the land used for the Highway 97 corridor, and acted in good faith with the province regarding the conditions for use of WFN lands,” said a WFN news release.

“WFN is committed, like any local government, to managing their resources responsibly.

“WFN places a high value on the environment and the protection of watersheds, and is committed to working with neighboring governments within established protocols,” it reads.

The Regional District of Central Okanagan, however, has confirmed it is against the exchange.

“The regional board is unanimous in opposition to a Crown land application that has been discussed in camera over the past two years,” the RDCO stated in a press release.

“The board resolution does not support a proposed application from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure relating to a portion of Rose Valley Regional Park and the adjacent Rose Valley reservoir watershed.”

The regional board said it is concerned that, if the land exchange occurs, a precedent will be set where the ministry can impact other legal tenure agreements with other local governments or agencies in other areas of the province.

wpaterson "at" kelownacapnews.com

Blue Divider Line

FOI laws need fixing
Vernon Morning Star - January 15, 2011

While some segments of society will always be distrustful of government, more and more we’re hearing about bureaucracy being used to frustrate citizens and media.

A recent study shows Canada places last among five of its peers — Britain, Ireland, Australia and New Zealand.

The British researchers concluded that Canada’s system has become antiquated and no longer serves as a model for others to follow. That’s not surprising as the world is a much different place than when Canada established its Freedom Of Information system almost 30 years ago. What isn’t clear from this study is how many other countries have also overtaken Canada in easing access to government documents.

Freedom of information is vital because it is intrinsically linked to the right to free speech. Canada and B.C. must do a better job of using new technologies to make it easier for citizens to readily gather information about the inner workings of our governments.

With profound change happening among provincial leadership and with Canadians looking at a trip to the polls sooner than later, the electorate deserves to know how candidates will improve current FOI rules.

If current governments – or those waiting for a chance to be elected – want to keep their parties viable, they’ll need to change the way they embrace transparency.

Canadians demand open and accessible government. It’s time for both the provincial and federal governments to take freedom of information seriously.

— Black Press

Blue Divider Line

Freedom of Information Request Statistics

These statistics are compiled from the Province of BC’s Corporate Request Tracking System (CRTS). The reports provide summaries of access requests by ministry, type of applicant, request disposition or processing times. For details on criteria used within the report, click here.

OIPC - It's About Time: Report Card on the Timeliness of Government Access to Information Responses

Office of the Information & Privacy Commissioner for BC Orders, Investigations & Decisions

Blue Divider Line

You had a chance to share your views about the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, as there was a Special Committee to review the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and who were accepting online submissions.

Online submissions were accepted until Feb. 28, 2010.

Make an online submission http://www.leg.bc.ca/foi/


click for larger newspaper article

Public Consultations Background
Background: Parliamentary Review of FIPPA
Section 80 of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA) requires that the Act be reviewed by a special committee of the Legislative Assembly every six years, with the first six-year period to begin on October 4, 1997.

The first review was undertaken by an all-party Special Committee between 1997 and 1999. The Committee heard from 84 presenters at nine public hearings and considered 136 written submissions. Its Report recommended 18 legislative amendments and was adopted by the House on July 15, 1999.

The second review was undertaken by an all-party Special Committee between 2003 and 2004. This Committee heard from 22 presenters at public hearings in Vancouver and Victoria and received 53 written submissions. Its Report was adopted by the House on May 19, 2004, and 16 of the Committee’s 28 recommendations remain to be implemented by policy or legislation.

-----------------------------

Can you believe that is all the written submissions they received?  There may have been 62 less presenters the second time around due to only holding public hearings at two locations instead of 9 locations like at the first public hearing, although there were less written submissions the second time around as well.

Blue Divider Line

You should see some of the comments people made about the Freedumb of Information Act

.pdf icon Canadian Taxpayers Federation Submission
The CTF recommends any organization receiving tax dollars be subject to the FOIPP Act with regard to how those dollars are spent.

.pdf icon D. Babcock
D. Babcock said, "As a taxpayer it is our money and we have right and an interest to know what our elected representatives did with our money.  They are working for us not the other way around!

.pdf icon C.M. Belanger
C.M. Belanger said, "The current government has made freedom of information impossible for real people! Charging huge amounts and imposing their ridiculously long wait time (an added and deliberate obstacle). When the request finally is committed the information is mostly BLACKED OUT!"

.pdf icon D. Schreck
D. Schreck said, "Changes to the Act are important, but no changes can replace the need for a commitment throughout government to an attitude that the public has a right to know what is going on in government."

.pdf icon B. Skakun
B. Skakun said, "This Privacy Act is in my opinion designed to protect governments at all levels putting the onus on the applicant to fight government for information that is" Clearly in the Public Interest"

okanaganlakebc.ca's sentiments exactly!
By reading every submission, okanaganlakebc.ca has come to the conclusion that people want access to information about BC Ferries, BC Rail, ICBC, Native Bands, but are having a hard time getting information, plus they don't like the long waits sometimes a year or more for the information.

Blue Divider Line


This FOIPOP chart showing who all made foi requests was in the submission made by Mark Weiler to the Legislative Assembly of BC Special Committee to Review the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act here on the Legislative Committee's website.

Blue Divider Line

BC: Return to the Principles of Transparency and Accountability

VANCOUVER:The Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) released a new report today recommending that the Committee to Review the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act (FOIPPA) adopt the principles espoused in 1998 by then opposition leader Gordon Campbell and commit to open and transparent government.

"While in opposition, our premier said: ‘governments should facilitate access, not obstruct it,’” said Maureen Bader, BC Director of the CTF. "Governments are spending taxpayers’ money, so it’s only right that taxpayers should have access to the information government holds."

The CTF forwarded two recommendations to the committee, designed to make government more accountable to taxpayers. The first recommendation is that all information in the public interest must be routinely disclosed.

"It's time government follow its own past recommendations and move to a system of proactive disclosure to ensure government transparency," said Bader. "If openness is the default, there would be no need for government to waste money trying to block access to information.”

The second CTF recommendation is to make any organization receiving tax dollars subject to disclosure under the Act. This stems from problems with accountability resulting from the government's removal of public organizations, such as B.C. Ferries, from the Act, and a greater use of private sector firms to deliver government services.

"As we saw in the case of B.C. Ferries, when an organization is removed from the FOIPPA, the government no longer minds the store and if citizens are unable to investigate, their hard-earned tax dollars could be wasted," said Bader. "Competition from the private sector in the provision of government services is a welcomed development, however to ensure that taxpayers get the best bang for their buck, the way those tax dollars are spent must be transparent."

By: Maureen Bader
Posted: February 17, 2010
For the full submission .pdf icon click here.

Blue Divider Line

If the Regional District of Central Okanagan does not want to release a Freedom of Information Act request, the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner cannot do a thing about it but follow the Freedom of Information Act law.

If the Regional District wants to delay releasing the information for 60 (business) days they are permitted to publish the information on the web and by doing so is also refusing to release the information until they are good and ready. 

If there is a 30 day quashing period for a bylaw you need information to quash, then you are totally out of luck.

if the Regional District does not publish the information within the 60 days they have another 30 (business) days.

If you are wondering where the business part of the 30 days comes in, just look at the definition of day in the Freedom of Information Act.

Blue Divider Line

If you wish to share your views about the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, there is a Special Committee to review the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act who are accepting online submissions

Online submissions will be accepted until Feb. 28, 2010.

Make an online submission http://www.leg.bc.ca/foi/

click for larger newspaper article

Blue Divider Line

FOI double standard?
VICTORIA/CKNW(AM980) - by Sean Leslie - 9/4/2010

Media organizations like CKNW received some illuminating information on the Harmonized Sales Tax through a Freedom of Information request this week, but other groups got nothing back even though they filed similar requests. Now, they say there's a better and cheaper way to go.

The concept is called Routine Disclosure; rather than make people and groups file expensive and time consuming Freedom of Information requests, simply post as much information online as possible.

New Democrat MLA Doug Routley: "Restore faith in democracy to the people of the Province, but it would also save an enormous amount of money."

Vincent Gogolek with the Freedom of Information Association agrees, "That should be the default. That should be what normally happens. We've got information? Let's just put it up."

Both the Association and NDP have filed official complaints after their FOI requests on the HST came up empty.

The NDP is wondering why it got nothing back from the Government on a Freedom of Information request on the Harmonized Sales Tax, while CKNW and other media outlets received more than 130 pages of information this week.

MLA Doug Routley says the Finance Ministry said it had no records in response to the opposition request, "And the fact that we came back with a no-records response shows that again this Government is exercising misleading tactics that are meant to hide their responsibility for having originally mislead the people about the HST."

Routley is asking the Information and Privacy Commissioner to investigate. The Commissioner is already probing a similar complaint from the BC Freedom of Information Association.

We never got what we asked for about some subjects either ... especially about Valley of the Sun water system .... hmmmm!

Every delegation request denied.  Did not receive FOI requested.

Read more about it here.

Blue Divider Line

NORD waives information fee
Vernon Morning Star - By Richard Rolke - November 07, 2009

The North Okanagan Regional District will eat the cost of a $36 Freedom of Information request.

The board is waiving the fee the Concerned Citizens of Grindrod was billed when it asked regional district staff for 25 pages of documents dealing with a proposed animal waste composting facility.

“It’s all about the principle of Freedom of Information,” said director Patrick Nicol.

“They should get that information. They are just looking for the information and we should get it to them.”

However, director Wayne Lippert questioned why a group that had 1,130 people sign a petition opposing the facility couldn’t come up with $36.

“With the number of people involved, why are they asking for it to be waived? It (36) is not a big number,” he said.

In a letter to the regional district, Concerned Citizens of Grindrod cite limited financial resources as the reason for wanting the fee waived.

“Our funds to date have been donated by citizens and if the proposal is passed, we will attempt to raise money for legal action,” states the group.

“Due to our non-existent funds, we would appreciate it if you would consider excusing your fees to assist us in our endeavours.”

Director Mike Macnabb disagreed with questioning the organization’s ability to pay.

“It’s not up to the board to decide if a group is bona fide or not. It’s up to us to decide whether we waive the fee or not,” he said.

“And for $36, I think we can afford it.”

The Freedom of Information Act indicates fees can be waived when the applicant cannot afford the payment or the record relates a matter of public interest, including the environment, public health or safety.

The actual bill for the Concerned Citizens of Grindrod FOI request was $36.25 — $30 for preparing and producing reports for disclosure and $6.25 for copying the records. The act requires that the first three hours be provided at no cost.

Blue Divider Line

Information that will be published or released within 60 days
20 (1) The head of a public body may refuse to disclose to an applicant information

(a) that is available for purchase by the public, or

(b) that, within 60 days after the applicant's request is received, is to be published or released to the public.

(2) The head of a public body must notify an applicant of the publication or release of information that the head has refused to disclose under subsection (1) (b).

(3) If the information is not published or released within 60 days after the applicant's request is received, the head of the public body must reconsider the request as if it were a new request received on the last day of that period, but the information must not be refused under subsection (1) (b).

Blue Divider Line

Freedom of Information Act (This Act is Current to May 20, 2009)
[RSBC 1996] CHAPTER 165

Protection of public body from legal suit
73 No action lies and no proceeding may be brought against the government, a public body, the head of a public body, an elected official of a public body or any person acting on behalf of or under the direction of the head of a public body for damages resulting from

(a) the disclosure, or failure to disclose, in good faith of all or part of a record under this Act or any consequences of that disclosure or failure to disclose, or

(b) the failure to give any notice required under this Act if reasonable care is taken to give the required notice.

Blue Divider Line

If the comment form below does not work,

Blue Divider Line

Comment Form

NAME  
ADDRESS  
COMMUNITY    *(required)
(If your community is not listed above, please type it in below and choose "other community" above)
 
PHONE NUMBER  
EMAIL ADDRESS  
 disguise your email address from spam similar to this below
 name "at" hotmail.com
COMMENTS  

 

Blue Divider Line

View resident's comments here.

Blue Divider Line

Westside Road Gossip
Make a Comment

INDEX WR ] INDEX ALL ] Advis. Plan Comm ] Alt Approval ] Ambulance ] Argo Road Maint. ] BC Hydro ] Budget 2010 ] Budget 2011 ] Budget 2012 ] Budget 2013 ] Budget 2014 ] Budget 2015 ] Building Inspect ] Build Laws - BC ] Build Laws - RDCO ] Building Violations ] Bylaw Anon ] COW Elect. 08 ] COW Elect. 11 ] Director Edgson ] Dogs ] Easement Rds ] EDC ] Elect. Boundary ] Environ. Advisory ] ESS ] Finances ] Fintry Develop ] Fintry Park ] Fire Anon ] Fire Boat ] Fire Bylaws ] Fire Dept. ] Fire Dept FOI ] Fire Hydrants ] Fire Minutes ] Fires  House ] [ FOI Act ] Friends Fintry ] Garbage ] Garbage Area ] Garbage Bylaws ] Garbage Com 08 ] Garbage Contracts ] Garbage Finance ] Garbage FOI ] Garbage FOI ] Garbage LaCasa ] Garbage Locker ] Garbage Minutes ] Garbage NOWESI ] Garbage Ombudsman ] Garbage Prob ] Garbage Secret ] Garbage Solution ] Garbage Survey ] Garbage Traders ] Governance Wide ] Government ] Grants-in-aid ] Helicopters ] History ] Killiney Beach Park ] Killiney Hall ] LaCasa ] Motorized Rec. ] NWCA ] NWCA FOI ] NW OCP ] NW Parks ] OKIB ] OKIB Logging ] OKIB Road ] OKIB Tax ] Peacocks ] Police Tax ] Property Tax ] RDCO ] RDCO Dog Minutes ] RDCO Jokes ] RDCO Policy ] RDCO Regs ] Report Animals ] Residents Network ] Septic Systems ] Subdiv. History ] T. Mnt After Fire ] Terrace Mount. Fire ] Trench Burner ] Vote Boxes ] Water Budget 08 ] Water Budget 09 ] Water Budget 10 ] Water Bylaws ] Water Construct ] Water FOI ] Water Grants ] Water Judgement ] Water L Fintry ] Water Laws ] Water Meters ] Water Minutes ] Water Rates ] Water Right-of-Way ] Water Survey ] Water System ] Water Systems ] Water VOS ] Water VOS Pics ] Water Wells ] Water Well Data ] Westshore Playgrnd ] Westshore Sports ] Westside Rd. ] WR Development ] WR Incorporation ] WR Overpass ] WRIC ] Zoning Bylaw 66 ] Zoning Bylaw 81 ] Zoning Bylaw 871 ]

Blue Divider Line

Westside Road Gossip
Read Comments

Adv. Plan Comm. ] Alt. Approval ] Ambulance ] Argo Road ] BC Hydro ] Budget 2010 ] Budget 2011 ] Budget 2012 ] Budget 2013 ] Budget 2014 ] Budget 2015 ] Building Inspection ] Build Laws - BC ] Build Laws - RDCO ] Building Violations ] COW Elect 08 ] COW Elect. 11 ] Director Edgson ] Dogs ] Easement Roads ] EDC ] Elect. Boundary ] Environ. Advisory ] ESS ] Finance ] Fintry Develop ] Fintry Park ] Fire Boat ] Fire Bylaws ] Fire Dept. ] Fire Dept FOI ] Fire Hydrants ] Fire Minutes ] Fires House ] FOI Act ] Friends Fintry ] Garbage ] Garbage Area ] Garbage Bylaws ] Garb Comment 08 ] Garbage Contract ] Garbage Finance ] Garbage FOI ] Garbage FOI ] Garbage La Casa ] Garbage Locker ] Garbage Minutes ] Garbage NOWESI ] Garbage Ombudsman ] Garbage Questionaire ] Garbage Secret ] Garbage Solution ] Garbage Survey ] Garbage Traders ] Governance Wide ] Government ] Helicopters ] History ] Killiney Hall ] Killiney Park ] La Casa ] Motorized Rec. ] NW OCP ] NWCA ] NWCA FOI ] NW Parks ] OKIB ] OKIB Logging ] OKIB Road ] OKIB Tax ] Peacocks ] Police Tax ] Property Tax ] RDCO ] RDCO Dog Minutes ] RDCO Jokes ] RDCO Policy ] RDCO Regs ] Report Animals ] Septic Systems ] Subdiv. History ] T. Mtn After Fire ] Terrace Mnt. Fire ] Trench Burner ] Vote Box ] Water Budget 08 ] Water Budget 09 ] Water Budget 10 ] Water Bylaws ] Water Construct ] Water FOI ] Water Grants ] Water Judgements ] Water Laws ] Water Meters ] Water Minutes ] Water Rates ] Water Right-of-Way ] Water Survey ] Water System ] Water VOS ] Water VOS Pics ] Water Well Data ] Water Wells ] Westside Road ] WR Development ] WR Incorporation ] WR Overpass ] WRIC ] Zoning Bylaw 66 ] Zoning Bylaw 1981 ] Zoning Bylaw 871 ]

Blue Divider Line

Gossip
In Other Towns

INDEX ALL ] Boucherie Rd ] Kaleden ] Kelowna ] Naramata ] Oyama ] Peachland ] Penticton ] Summerland ] Vernon ] West Kelowna ] Westside Road ] Winfield ]

Blue Divider Line

Index

Boucherie Road ] Kaleden ] Kelowna ] Naramata ] Oyama ] Peachland ] Pentiction ] Summerland ] Vernon ] West Kelowna ] Westside Road ] Winfield ]

You will find local North Westside Road BC businesses, services, classifieds, local arts and crafts, vacation waterfront rentals, plus much more located near and around Okanagan Lake. We will be adding to this site, so come back and check it often.

Blue Divider Line

Disclaimer: Information posted on this website may not always necessarily be true, but is based on the best ability of the publisher (under the basis that nobody's perfect).  Please be warned by this disclaimer that the publisher's have been known to make mistakes before.  Please let the publisher know if you do notice any mistakes by filling out the feedback form, and mistakes will be corrected immediately.

2006-2015 okanaganlakebc.ca